Martindale Awards

Peer

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale Ratings

Average Peer Rating

4.7/5.0

Average Client Rating

100% client recommended

Reviews (39)

Review Us

Sort by:

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Member 2014/07/15

5.0/5.0

Tim is an excellent attorney with a keen analytical mind and strong ethics.

Partner 2014/07/06

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Member 2014/06/30

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Partner 2014/06/30

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Partner 2014/06/30

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Partner 2014/06/29

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Member 2014/06/29

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Partner 2014/06/29

5.0/5.0

Tim is very sensitive to corporate ethics and compliance issues.

Of Counsel 2013/02/25

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Managing Partner 2012/10/23

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Managing Partner 2012/10/18

5.0/5.0

Sheila was a great mentor where we worked together.

Principal 2012/09/15

5.0/5.0

Excellent attorney!

Partner 2012/09/14

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Sole Practitioner 2012/09/04

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Sole Practitioner 2012/09/04

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Sole Practitioner 2012/09/04

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Managing Partner 2012/08/31

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Partner 2012/08/22

5.0/5.0

I have known and worked with Sheila on both a professional and personal level, enjoyed her excellent presentations at estate planning seminars, now am a co-author with her (and others) of 'Estate Planning in...

Managing Partner 2012/08/21

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Partner 2012/08/21

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Member 2012/08/21

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Partner 2012/03/23

5.0/5.0

a very conscientious lawyer.

Of Counsel 2012/03/15

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Principal 2011/06/04

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Principal 2011/06/04

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Principal 2011/06/04

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Partner 2010/05/27

5.0/5.0

No description provided

Client 2010/04/13

4.8/5.0

No description provided

Partner 2014/07/18

4.0/5.0

No description provided

Of Counsel 2012/08/21

4.0/5.0

No description provided

Sole Practitioner 2012/08/21

4.0/5.0

No description provided

Partner 2012/03/15

4.0/5.0

No description provided

In-house Counsel 2010/06/01

3.8/5.0

No description provided

Associate 2014/05/07

3.6/5.0

No description provided

Sole Practitioner 2011/06/13

2.2/5.0

No description provided

Sole Practitioner 2011/06/12

2.2/5.0

No description provided

Sole Practitioner 2011/06/12

2.0/5.0

No description provided

Sole Practitioner 2011/06/12

2.0/5.0

No description provided

Sole Practitioner 2011/06/12